吾国与吾民 | my country and my people
© 2013
  • 01 blog 博客
  • 02 about 关于
  • 03 Resources 资源
    • online sources
    • books
    • movies
  • 04 Podcast 播客
  • 05 proverbs 成语
  • 06 quotes 引语
  • 10 语言 Sprache
  • 11 饮食 Ernährung
  • 12 教育 Bildung
  • 13 生活的空间 Lebensraum
  • 14 环境 Environment
  • 15 创新 Innovation
  • 16 银行业务 Banking
  • 17 大同 World Order
  • 18 腐败 Corruption
  • 19 移民 Leaving China
  • 20 价值宣传 Value Propaganda
  • 21 Fish, Energy and XJP
  • 22 Fintech, Freud and CCP
  • 30 Absurd Products
  • 31 Lost in Translation
  • 32 Sound Slumber
  • 33 Propaganda Posters
  • 34 Mordor's Light 魔都的时光
    • Mordor Manual
    • 00 Essentials
    • 01 Grounding Neighborhood
    • 02 The Big Picture
    • 03 Past, Present and Future
    • 04 Balancing Body and Mind
    • ME01 Hangzhou
    • ME02 Beijing
    • ME03 Hong Kong
    • ME04 Taiwan
    • ME05 Japan
  • 40 contact 联系

If China can not shape the internet, the internet will shape China. 

12/22/2014

4 Comments

 
Since a few months surfing the WWW has become more of a pain as it has been ever since I can remember. My VPN hardly performs the way I like it to, and waiting for minutes to open foreign pages has changed my surfing behavior tremendously.

As such, I don't use google, but use yahoo for foreign sites. Recently, I skip foreign websites all together. Its just to much of a hassle. Facebook is substituted by Tencent's WeChat. Amazon by Taobao. Ebay by Taobao. Well done! The state controlled approach to the capitalist market works.

I continue to apologize myself for under- or not performing skype calls, and poor pixel quality on our corporate video conference system. The later operates through a bloody expensive tunnel which should warrant a non-interference connection to our HQ. But we have learned to survive behind the great Chinese Firewall. We have learned to get to terms with less freedom. We, the foreigners used to a web that responds fast and without restraints.

Since August our daughter attends an international school in Shanghai and has homework that involves English speaking foreign websites like raz-kids or starfall. These websites are a great learning support, but guess what: they are either entirely blocked or slowed down to a non operable surfing experience.

A brief holiday in Thailand does feel a bit like having jumped over the Berliner Mauer. Even though I don't spend much time anymore on facebook, it's just great that I can read posts from my friends back home. Home is now Shanghai, and there most of our present day friends use WeChat for the same reasons we do. Therefore we don't have too much need to use facebook. It's just this feeling, that those bloody Beijing bureaucrats (BBBs) intrude on my life, bring obstacles to my privacy, seize freedom from me.

About a month ago I tried in a last effort to improve our home surfing situation and switched from 东方有线 (oriental cable) to 中国电信 (China Telecom). A 100 MB broad band connection instead of a 2 MB rather not so broad band sounded promising. But frustration soon set in as we realized our surfing quality was still subject to censorship.

Then a week later our so, I listened to sinica's podcast on the internet conference in Wuzhen and even though sensing that something must be going on, the parts eventually fell in place. Telling our IT engineer about the podcast he confirmed the WWW restructuring with some IP address tests that he had carried out. In other words, this is not just a policy, the re-structuring is already a fact.

These are just the observations of someone who has to deal with the web due to international private and corporate relations. But they boil down to a similar base line that is also discussed in both the mentioned podcast and the Chinafile conversation:

1. if China does not shape the internet, the internet will shape China - Western influence might thus - in old party jargon - pollute the Chinese mind and subvert the authority of the Communist Party.
2. the WWW increasingly turns into a bipolar virtual world with two civilization concepts as its antipodes; I would say one is rather based on technological purpose and limited bureaucratic intervention; and another one on technological intervention for bureaucratic purpose.
3. China's virtual conquest is indeed scary, because it offers a blue print for the real world and shows with which new negotiation styles the Western world will have to deal with. Is it ready though?
4 Comments

Germany’s Relations with China and the World

7/2/2014

1 Comment

 
The last evening of June. Friends of ours are on the way to the airport to leave China for good. A departure wave has reached our circle of acquaintances. I should have probably taken them to the airport personally, but I chose to attend for the first time a Young China Watchers (YCW) event.

The distinguished speaker is Dr. Peter Hefele, director of the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung (KAS) Shanghai Office. He speaks on “Germany’s relations with China and the World” and is introduced by a young fellow, called Frank, with Chinese looks and American behavior from the John Hopkins Association, which cooperates with YMC for these monthly events. He is a typical banana, outside yellow, inside white, I would say, but I have to give him the credits that he does a great moderator job in his somewhat dry attitude, which he breaks up with a final joke at the end of the evening. I realize that I am not anymore an ideal fit for such events: YMC is for young people up to 40 years of age, which I am reaching soon and in fact most people attending are in their late 20ies or early 30ies. As the floor opens up for questions, I am taken aback by sophisticated questions that are being asked by these folks and I remember that I had a similar investigative attitude 15 to 20 years ago. Things have changed though and my life has different, much more personal priorities, and my heart tells me that although I am intellectually still interested in such events, I have moved on.

Three insights which Dr. Hefele, who holds a PhD in economics, shares with the plenum cause me to respond.

1. Firstly, his reply to Frank’s introduction referring to an Economist article, in which it is questioned whether Germany is part of the West. Peter Hefele confirms that Germany is a part of the West, but also emphazises that for many Chinese “the West” seems to be nothing more than the US. The West according to KAS is Europe and in particular North America; this partnership, the transatlantic alliance, is highlighted throughout Dr. Hefele’s talk. I am somewhat surprised that there is no reference made to common cultural values, but to NATO or other supranational institutions. The decisive dividing line between the East and the West can not be made according to national borders, it already exists along the cultural hemispheres that people carry within their mindset. Samuel Huntington described this already in the 90ies in his book “The Clash of Cultures”. The question “are you part of the West?” should not be directed at Germany, it should be directed at Russia, of which I thought that it had started to slowly integrate itself into the Western communities. But quite on the contrary, it has emerged during the last few months as a new regional power, a new Eastern power, which makes China a “the Far East”.

2. This leads to another question: should the EU continue to enlarge itself? KAS and as such Christian-conservative EU policymakers believe that the EU has already overstretched itself. Structural problems of the EU as such and some member states, currently of one of its principal members, France, are to be overcome before another enlargement can be faced. The EU lives from its axis Paris-Berlin and in recent years to a growing extent from also from the axis Berlin-Warsaw. These three national governments are decisive for the policy making in Brussels, because the represent the largest EU nations. London is important too, but constitutes a problem of its own.

With Russia on the rise as a singular regional power, I was surprised that there was no talk about the growing energy insecurity that the EU faces. A recent economist article showed clearly that some EU member states are up to 80% dependent on Russian gas imports. In the face of such an dependency, all the EU negotiations, sanctions, and to some extent threatening of Russia, become nothing more than hot air. In my opinion, the EU needs to enlarge itself into a similar entity like once the Roman Empire was. The concept of an EU that develops at different velocity in different realms like security, immigration, economic integration, shall be implemented in all countries bordering the Mediterranean Sea, where is would be possible to counterweight the Russian gas dependency with huge solar power potential, ready and infinite to tap in.

3. Dr. Hefele openly spoke against an integration of Turkey in spite of its NATO membership and strategic location. As such he represented the traditional Christian-conservative view that an Islamic nation can not be part of the EU. I don’t believe anymore that democratic shortcoming can be brought against a Turkish EU membership since Hungary has stayed a member state in spite of its non democratic developments, ignoring and depriving subjects even from one of the fundamental rights of a Western democracy: the property right.

Islamic cultures have been part of Europe for large stretches of our common history. Southern Spain was Muslim for almost 800 years, South Eastern Europe was Muslim for a similar period and some regions continue to be. It is true that these religious conflict always gave way to wars like in former Yugoslavia in the early 90ies, but I believe that exactly the integration of such a fundamental antagonism is part of the EU character. Like Mr. Hefele said himself, Europeans have already transcended the nation state mind; many Europeans consider themselves a national citizen and an EU citizen, as such a new identity has been formed over the last 60 year that is not easily comprehensible by somebody from outside; surely not for US Americans and in particular not by Chinese, because the EU formed itself voluntarily, on the basis of a consensus.

1 Comment

prostitution as indicator how policy choices come down to culture and ideology

11/20/2013

0 Comments

 
a recent article in The Economist on prostitution in Germany closes with the below paragraph, comparing the different policies in two cultural similar countries, Sweden and Germany.

In the end, the policy choice comes back to culture and ideology, argues Susanne Dodillet at the University of Göteborg. Both the Swedish and the German laws originated in the feminist and left-leaning movements in these countries. But whereas progressive Swedes view their state as able to set positive goals, Germans (the Greens, especially) mistrust the state on questions of personal morality as a hypocritical and authoritarian threat to self-expression. Only this can explain why Swedes continue overwhelmingly to support their policy, and Germans theirs.

the article reminded me of a podcast which I listened this May on sinica on the presentation of a new Earnshaw book, Sex in China by Richard Burger. Jeremy Goldkorn, known for his outspokenness, makes the quote of the year, indicating that there is a decisive pro-prostitution culture and ideology in the Chinese government.

The Chinese government needs hookers. All politicians are married to some women they don't like, because it was better for their career. The entire government would fall apart if they would ban prostitution.

Interestingly Germans and Chinese seem to have one thing in common: they mistrust the state on questions of personal morality and view it as a hypocritical and authoritarian threat to self-expression. that's why tens of thousands Chinese flock to IKEA on weekends: to smell a breeze of true freedom.




0 Comments

    Archives

    June 2022
    May 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    July 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    October 2019
    September 2019
    July 2019
    November 2018
    August 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    January 2012
    August 2003
    May 2001
    April 2001
    March 2001
    November 2000
    October 2000

    Categories

    All
    Banking
    Bildungssystem
    China
    Chinglish
    Coffee
    Consumer
    Consumption
    Corruption
    Economics
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Evolution
    Face
    Fashion
    Feiertage
    Fernsehen
    Gesellschaft
    Government
    Identity
    Imperialism
    Industrie
    Innovation
    Internet
    Japan
    Kommunisten
    Landesverteidigung
    Language
    Law
    Medien
    Nationalismus
    Nutrition
    One Belt One Road
    Pax Americana
    Policy
    Power
    Prostitution
    Purpose
    Reisen
    Religion
    Russia
    Silk Road
    Soe
    Technology
    Teleology
    Tourism
    Transportation
    Ukraine
    Umweltverschmutzung
    Urbanisation
    US
    Waste
    Wirtschaft
    Xi Jinping
    Xinjiang

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly